Abolitionists & Disunionists, Aftermath: Despotism, Aftermath: Destruction, America Transformed, Bringing on the War, Conservatism and Liberalism, Crimes of War, Crusaders and Revolutionaries, Economics, Enemies of the Republic, Hatred of the American South, Jeffersonian America, Lincoln Revealed, Lincoln's Blood Lust, Lincoln's Revolutionary Legacy, Looting the Conquered, Lost Cultures, Myth of Saving the Union, New England History, New England's Cultural Imperialism, No Compromise, Northern Culture Laid Bare, Pathways to Central Planning, Republican Party 
Comments Off on Constitutional Convention on the Battlefield Constitutional Convention on the Battlefield
The war of 1861-1865 seemed a violent replay of the 1800 election between Federalist John Adams and Republican Thomas Jefferson – and settling the question of whether New England or Virginia would dominate and guide the country. Author Russell Kirk observed in 1953 that “The influence of the Virginia mind upon American politics expired in the Civil War,” and that it would take 100 years for the ideas of a limited central government and free market ideas to begin a recovery.
Bernhard Thuersam, www.Circa1865.org
Constitutional Convention on the Battlefield
“Beginning with the modern civil-rights movement in the late 1950s, it became popular and “politically correct” to proclaim that the Civil War was fought for the purpose of abolishing slavery and therefore was a just and great war. This gave the civil-rights movement much of its momentum, but it also served to injure race relations severely, and further, to mask the immense and disastrous costs of the Civil War, which included the deaths of 620,000 soldiers.
The destruction of the South and its Jeffersonian ideals of a free market, a non-interventionist foreign policy, and a limited central government were replaced by the ideals of Hamilton, thereby completely transforming the American government created by its founders.
The Civil War was, in effect, a new constitutional convention held on the battlefield, and the original document was drastically amended by force in order to have a strong centralized federal government, which was closely allied with industry in the North.
Foreign policy would now become heavily influenced by the economic interests of big business rather than by any concern for the freedom of the individual. Domestic policies of regulation, subsidy and tariff would now benefit big business at the expense of small business and the general population.
Beginning with the end of the Civil War, the American mind and policy would become molded into the image of Hamilton rather than Jefferson.”
(The Costs of War: America’s Pyrrhic Victories, John V. Denson, editor, 1999, Transaction Publishers, 1999, excerpts pp. 27-28)