Below, Wilmington, North Carolina editor Edward Cantwell communicates with Charles Wilkes of New York, a naval officer and explorer, regarding his views on political independence. The latter, as commander of the USS San Jacinto in early November 1861, acquired infamy for seizing the British mail steamer Trent. Cantwell enclosed his views presented to the North Carolina House of Commons on December 3, 1860.
A Fact Beyond Dispute
“A Plan of Adjustment through the Treaty Making Powers of the President and Senate.”
House of Commons, Raleigh, December 31, 1860.
I believe in the right of secession, and unless the Northern people, through their representatives in Congress and their State legislatures, shall not immediately grant us of North Carolina the justice and guaranties we demand, I am in favor of immediate secession on the part of this State and the other Southern States.
The newspapers of the day do not give us any assurance that we can obtain these without bloodshed, but you who occupy a prominent position at the Capital, and may therefore be better informed than they, think otherwise, and you ask me to state what, in my opinion, will restore peace, and prevent a further disruption of the Union.
I am of the opinion that it is not too late to save the present American Union, and to prevent civil strife in North Carolina, and elsewhere, by the adoption of a wise and bold statesmanship, and that the means of doing so are within the means of Mr. Buchanan, and may at once be instituted by him, without any new step on his part, or sacrifice of his published opinions, and without any surrender or further compromise of principle on the part of the South.
If you will turn to the letter of Mr. Daniel Webster to the Chevalier Halseman . . . on the recognition of Hungarian independence, and to the instructions given to our Minister in Mexico, etc., you will perceive that the federal government has been for many years committed under different administrations to the doctrine that a government de facto, quietly possessed of all the powers of the State, and peacefully engaged in their unlimited exercise, however originated, and composed of one man or many, is to all intents and purposes a government de jure, and entitled to be recognized and regarded as such by all other powers.
Whatever may be the opinions of Mr. Buchanan upon the subject of secession, it is a fact beyond dispute, I apprehend, that the South Carolina Convention now in session at Charleston, & whose delegates are in [Washington] demanding recognition as the ambassadors of a foreign State, are de facto possessed of all the powers of the State of South Carolina, and are on this day publicly, openly and notoriously engaged in the exercise of every function which belongs to the government of the State, and that, right or wrong, they are fully prepared to maintain their independence by force of arms wherever required.
I would like to know, even though we did not recognize the right of secession, how can we offer South Carolina a different treatment than that which Texas and Mexico received from Great Britain and the United States? The case becomes stronger, when the federal authority with us has announced that the Constitution does not warrant the employment of force, or a declaration of war against a seceding, or if you please, a revolted State.”
(The Papers of William A. Graham, Vol. V, 1857-1863. M. Williams & J.G. De Roulhac Hamilton, NC Department of Archives and History, 1973, pp. 210-212)